|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 4 results for Arezaei
A. Asadi, M. Kamalinejade, S. Arezaei,
Volume 7, Issue 1 (Spring 2016)
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Poly cystic ovary syndrome is seen in about 5%-15% of women during reproductive years, and is one of the most important cause of oligomenorrhea and infertility. The common treatment in modern medicine is ocp and in permanent cyst is ovary tissue save surgery. in the other side, use of metformin that increases tissue sensitivity to insulin and decreases insulin level has exetended in recent years. Prevalence, side effects, unsuccessful treatments and increase unnecessary surgeries in permanent cysts persuaded us to compare the effect of shilunum capsule on the regression of ovarian cysts in pco patient with metforming effect.
Methods and Materials: a prospective clinical trial was undergone at the infertility clinic of Mahdie hospital. Twenty patients wer selected based on sonographic appearance of ovaries. We divided them in two groups and gave one group metmorfin and another shilunum capsules.Then again all of those sonographic parameters evaluated and compared with each other.
Results: The results showed that both of these regimes are effective on decrease the number and size of cysts but the shilunum was more effective. 87/5% developed normal sonographic appearance with shilunum and 50% with metformin. on the other hand, the duration of treatment with shilunum capsules was only 2 weeks in comparison with 3 months in metformin. Also, these capsules didn`t have any side effects.
Conclusion: results showed the effective role of shilanum appearance in pco patients. But we need more studies with more samples about these effects, also evaluation of clinical effect of shilunum is recommended.
Mohammad Ahamadizadeh, Hamed Arezaei, Azam Ghasemi,
Volume 13, Issue 2 (summer 2022)
Abstract
One of the important entries in philosophy of medicine is the discussion on the reliance of medical knowledge and the health system on fundamental knowledge and the analysis of its philosophical roots. It is noteworthy that, not enough attention has been paid to this issue, to the extent that sometimes it is not deemed necessary for medicine and the health system. This study endeavors to explore a history of philosophical discussions in relation to medical issues among Islamic and contemporary philosophers, physicians, and especially philosopher-physicians. This study also touches on issues such as: What is health? Is health an objective fact or a credit matter? What is the relationship between illness and health? What is the origin of health and illness? Can non-physical things be effective in the health of the human body? What is pain? What are the criteria for classification of diseases? What is a mental illness and what is it like? How should the physician’s relationship with the patient be? Is it possible to prescribe death for reasons such as incurability or suffering? These are among objective and field questions of medical knowledge and the health system. In the attempt to answer the mentioned questions, a researcher is confronted with fundamental philosophical issues, especially philosophical anthropology. Indeed, different philosophical views on basic issues such as anthropology and the stages of man's life, philosophy of science, and the scientific methods can have a significant effect on formation of medical knowledge, and thereby, the health system. As a result, scientific principles and methods of diagnosis and treatment in a range of different medical schools, from modern medicine to traditional and complementary medicines, have undergone fundamental revisions and changes. This can lead to formation of medical systems over time, each of which is recognized in its own epistemological system and arising from unique philosophical foundations.
Majid Mollaaghababa, Hamed Arezaei,
Volume 13, Issue 3 (Fall 2022)
Abstract
Nowadays, drive theory, as a trend in psychology, analyzes the stages of volitional action. Ibn Sina has also theorized about the stages of human volitional action. The question is what the relationship is between these two types of attitudes regarding the motivation of human volitional action, according to the discussions of faculty of appetite (qūwa šawqiyya) in Ibn Sina's philosophy and the drive theory. It seems that with the frameworks presented in the drive theories and application of concepts such as the driver mode, goal-oriented behavior, achieving the right goal, reducing the driver mode, and relief when reaching the goal, it is possible to extract a theory about the motivation of human voluntary action from Ibn Sina's works. In this regard, by referring to Ibn Sina's works, we have extracted the components of his view on the faculty of appetite (qūwa nuzūʿiyya šawqiyya) and analyzed the related texts. After that, according to the new views on motivation, especially the drive theory, the desired concepts were extracted to reconstruct of Avicenna's view. Examining the literature led the writers to the point of view that in Ibn Sina's works, the process of motivating human volitional action is discussed. This process includes components such as imagining the act, creation of excitement, will, doing the act, and finally tranquility after doing the act. By comparing this mechanism and the theory of driving psychologists, we reach a similar pattern between these two theories. In other words, according to the comparative study between the drive theory and Ibn Sina's theory of willful motive faculties, it is possible to reach a similar structure for the stimulus of human volitional action in these two theories.
Hamed Arezaei,
Volume 15, Issue 1 (spring 2024)
Abstract
Literature is a mirror of culture and social relations at all times. Health and medicine, as part of culture and social life, have had a place in literature for a long time. As one of the most popular literary styles, especially in Arabic and Persian literature, the technique of Maqama writing has had many achievements for scholars, including in the representation of social life. Badīʿ al-Zamān al-Hamad̠ānī, who is considered the inventor of this technique, dedicated one of his Maqamat to "medicine". This part has been forgotten throughout history and omitted from most manuscripts and all official publications. Fortunately, the Yale manuscript has preserved this “Medical Maqama” In this article, concerning the technique of writing the Maqamat and its historical and social contexts and goals, we report and analyse this innovative Medical Maqama.
|
|
